In recent weeks, the college football world has been buzzing with speculation about a potential spring practice matchup between Nebraska and Colorado, sparked by Deion Sanders’ innovative approach to spring football. While the idea of rekindling this historic rivalry in a spring setting has captured fans’ imagination, it’s a proposition that carries more risks than rewards for the Huskers.
The concept of joint spring practices, particularly between two Power 5 programs like Nebraska and Colorado, presents several concerning factors. First and foremost is the risk of injury during what should be a developmental period. Spring practice is traditionally a time for refinement and growth, not high-stakes competition that could potentially sideline key players months before the actual season begins.
However, this doesn’t mean Nebraska should completely dismiss the idea of external competition during spring practice. A more measured approach would be to arrange scrimmages with in-state Division II programs like Wayne State or the University of Nebraska at Kearney. This strategy offers numerous benefits while minimizing risks.
The advantages of scrimmaging against smaller in-state schools are multifaceted. Players will be able to have controlled competition. These matchups provide real-game scenarios without the intense pressure and physical demands of facing a Power 5 opponent. It will also allow young players get valuable experience against collegiate competition outside their practice squad, helping them adjust to college football’s speed and intensity in a more manageable environment. Even though it will not be against a D1 school, success in these controlled scrimmages can boost player confidence heading into fall camp, particularly for younger players and those competing for starting positions while reducing the risk of injury.
The key difference between this approach and the proposed Colorado matchup lies in the risk-reward ratio. A spring scrimmage against Colorado would put Nebraska in a no-win situation, a victory would be expected, while a poor showing could impact recruiting and team morale.
For Nebraska’s coaching staff, including new Associate Head Coach Phil Snow and Special Teams Coordinator Mike Ekeler, these controlled scrimmages could provide valuable evaluation opportunities without compromising their strategic advantages or risking their players’ health.
As Nebraska continues to build under Matt Rhule’s leadership, the focus should remain on smart, strategic development rather than headline-grabbing exhibitions. While the Colorado proposal might generate buzz, the practical benefits of scrimmaging against smaller in-state programs align better with Nebraska’s long term goals and player development needs.
As Nebraska looks to continue its upward trajectory following their recent bowl game victory, making calculated decisions about spring practice structure will be crucial for sustained success. This would not even take place until 2026 as for Nebraska’s spring games is already planned out for this year. Its always something to think about.